Yotham Th. Timbonga
Jurnal
DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT REGARDING THE TERM OF OFFICE OF THE HEAD OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION
Abstrak
Purpose: The aim of this research is: To find out the term of office of the leadership of the
Corruption Eradication Commission in Indonesia and the legal considerations of Constitutional
Court Decision No.112/PUU-XX/2022 regarding the term of office of the leadership of the
Corruption Eradication Commission.
Methode: This research was conducted using normative legal analysis, with the approach
method being the statutory regulation approach. An analysis of the results of this research is
carried out by criticizing, supporting, or providing comments, then making a conclusion on the
research results with your thoughts and the help of a literature review.
Result: Constitutional Court Decision Number 112/PUUXX/2022, the term of office of the KPK
leadership will be 5 (five) years and they can be re-elected for only one term of office.
Conclusions: The Constitutional Court granted the request for an extension of the term of
office of the KPK leadership with considerations, namely: Firstly, there is discriminatory and
unfair treatment towards the KPK when comparing it with other independent government
institutions which have the same constitutional importance. Firstly, there is discriminatory and
unfair treatment towards the KPK if it equates it with other independent government
institutions which share constitutional importance, namely having a term of office of 5 years.
Second, because based on the principles of benefit and efficiency, the 5-year term of office for
the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Committee is much more useful and efficient so
that it can correspond to one term of office for the president.
Keywords: term of office, corruption eradication commission, constitutional court decision.
Corruption Eradication Commission in Indonesia and the legal considerations of Constitutional
Court Decision No.112/PUU-XX/2022 regarding the term of office of the leadership of the
Corruption Eradication Commission.
Methode: This research was conducted using normative legal analysis, with the approach
method being the statutory regulation approach. An analysis of the results of this research is
carried out by criticizing, supporting, or providing comments, then making a conclusion on the
research results with your thoughts and the help of a literature review.
Result: Constitutional Court Decision Number 112/PUUXX/2022, the term of office of the KPK
leadership will be 5 (five) years and they can be re-elected for only one term of office.
Conclusions: The Constitutional Court granted the request for an extension of the term of
office of the KPK leadership with considerations, namely: Firstly, there is discriminatory and
unfair treatment towards the KPK when comparing it with other independent government
institutions which have the same constitutional importance. Firstly, there is discriminatory and
unfair treatment towards the KPK if it equates it with other independent government
institutions which share constitutional importance, namely having a term of office of 5 years.
Second, because based on the principles of benefit and efficiency, the 5-year term of office for
the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Committee is much more useful and efficient so
that it can correspond to one term of office for the president.
Keywords: term of office, corruption eradication commission, constitutional court decision.
Dokumen Tersedia
